From Boardroom to Courtroom: Solicitor Struck off For Threatening a Director

After a qualified solicitor was handed a suspended prison sentence for blackmailing his business partner, he’s now been struck off by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT). This ruling underscores the severity of misconduct, not just within the legal profession but also in the corporate world. 

Misconduct can take various forms, and the consequences can be life-changing. In this article, we’ll uncover what transpired and explore the events that led to the SDT’s decision. We will also examine the types of misconduct directors can be guilty of, along with the potential repercussions for those found guilty. By understanding the gravity of such actions, individuals and businesses alike can take steps to avoid them.

If you’ve any employment law questions or believe your associated rights have been breached, please don’t hesitate to reach out. Redmans Solicitors are experts in the sector, and following a quick chat, we could provide specialist, tailored advice.

To find out more about how we could help, simply:

Struck Off: Director in Hot Water After Blackmailing Colleague

Mr Michael John Potter, a qualified solicitor since 1991, became a director at 350 PPM Ltd in September 2019. Initially, he worked with Mr Nicholas Dimmock, the founding director, before Mr John Price joined as a director a few months later.

By early 2020, the directors’ relationship had deteriorated, leading to exit negotiations. These escalated in July 2021 when Mr Potter and Mr Price threatened Mr Dimmock and the company. They demanded an exit settlement or an improved remuneration package; otherwise, they would report the company to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regarding alleged non-compliance.

However, when colleagues caught wind of the pair blackmailing their business partner, the misconduct was reported to the appropriate authorities. As a consequence, following investigations, Mr Potter faced blackmail charges under Section 21 of the Theft Act 1968. This legislation criminalises making demands with menaces with the intent of personal gain or causing loss to another.

In March 2023, the qualified solicitor was found guilty of the blackmail charges. He received a 12-month suspended prison sentence and was ordered to serve 240 hours of unpaid work.

Mr Potter is Struck Off by the SDT

Even though Mr Potter hadn’t practised as a qualified solicitor since 1994, barring a brief consultancy role in 2021, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal decided to review his case. The SDT exists to maintain the standards and reputation of the legal profession, and cases such as Mr Potter’s serve as crucial reminders of this role.

Following their investigations, the SDT concluded that Mr Potter’s misconduct was “extremely serious”, emphasising the need to uphold the reputation of the legal profession. Mr Potter had been blackmailing a colleague, and the SDT stated that such conduct undermined the core values of trust and integrity, which are essential to the law.

As a result, in August 2024, the tribunal ruled Mr Potter must be struck off the roll of solicitors, barring him from practising law. They also issued him with an order to pay £4,158 to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), which had initiated the disciplinary case against him.

When Directors Cross the Line: From Deceiving Shareholders to Negligence

While Mr Potter was struck off as a solicitor due to blackmailing his business partner, directors can be guilty of several forms of misconduct, each with its own consequences. Such misconduct not only impacts the individuals involved but also poses significant risks for the entire company. Some examples include:

  • Financial Mismanagement – This occurs when a director inappropriately handles a company’s finances, leading to detrimental consequences for the organisation and its stakeholders. They could engage in fraudulent activities, miss growth opportunities, or misrepresent profits and liabilities to deceive shareholders, which risks destabilising the organisation’s finances, potentially leading to bankruptcy or losing shareholder confidence.
  • Breach of Fiduciary Duties – Directors must act in the best interests of the company. Sometimes, though, this doesn’t happen, and they engage in transactions that benefit themselves. Alternatively, they may fail to disclose a conflict of interest or be negligent in their decision-making. Companies rely on transparent and ethical leadership to maintain stability, and the fallout from such misconduct can be devastating.
  • Insider Trading – This comes about when directors buy or sell shares based on confidential, non-public information. This practice allows them to make financial gains but is unethical and illegal.

Regardless of the misconduct at play, it’s essential that companies take steps to avoid, identify, and address it. If left unmanaged, such actions could result in significant financial and reputational damages to the company. Training, strict management, and policies that outline the potential repercussions of such misconduct could help achieve this. Read on to discover examples of the implications a guilty director may face.

The Price of Director Misconduct

If a director is found guilty of misconduct, the punishment they receive will depend on the gravity of the offence. In the case of the qualified solicitor who was struck off, he received a 12-month suspended prison sentence and community service. However, the punishment can vary and includes:

  • Criminal Charges – Severe misconduct, such as blackmail or fraud, could result in imprisonment, fines, or orders to pay restitution.
  • Civil Liabilities – If shareholders or the company itself suffer financial losses due to misconduct, those responsible may be held liable to compensate for the damage caused. This can result in lengthy and costly legal battles that drain resources.
  • Disciplinary Actions – If a director is found guilty of misconduct, they may be disqualified from holding similar positions in the future or face professional sanctions. The latter was imposed on Mr Potter when he was struck off.
  • Damage to Reputation – Aside from the legal repercussions, being found guilty of misconduct can significantly impact a director’s reputation. They may find that those within the organisation have lost faith, and they may struggle to find future employment opportunities. In the long term, this could lead to financial ruin and isolation from the industry in which they once thrived.

Need Employment Law Help? Contact Redmans Solicitors

As employment law specialists, Redmans Solicitors are well-placed to answer any of your associated queries. We could advise you on your possible next steps and, should you be eligible, guide you through the legal process.

To begin your journey with us now, please: