No More Right to Switch Off? UK Government Plans to Scrap Policy Amidst Amendments

What once appeared to be the solution to work-life balance issues for remote workers has now been declared “dead.” Labour pledged to introduce a right to switch off as part of its manifesto before the 2024 election to ensure employees could ignore work-related correspondence outside working hours.

However, a government source now claims this right will be scrapped to ensure economic “growth that puts money in people’s pockets.” We examine exactly what’s happened, the scrapped right to disconnect and explore the potential consequences of this decision.

If you have any employment law concerns, contact Redmans Solicitors without delay. As employment law experts, we can provide specialist advice and help you find a solution. To learn more:

What is the “Right to Switch Off”?

The “right to disconnect” or “switch off” has emerged as the line between work and personal life has blurred. This is especially true for those in remote working arrangements, where the home becomes a permanent office and communication via emails, texts, or phone calls makes it impossible to disconnect.

Labour’s manifesto committed to this right, with the Party believing employees shouldn’t have to answer work-related correspondence outside working hours. Influenced by similar models in European countries like Ireland and Belgium, the Labour government’s proposed right to switch off would prevent work from taking over personal time.

The Labour Government’s Right to Switch Off Plan

As part of Labour’s “New Deal for Working People,” the right to disconnect was pledged as a future reform. The plan was to ensure that answering emails after hours, or any form of work-related correspondence for that matter, wasn’t seen as a requirement. Workers were to have the legal right to ignore such communication without fear of repercussions.

A spokesperson for Prime Minister Keir Starmer emphasised the importance of rest in maintaining motivation and productivity. They discussed how “good employers” understand the damaging effects of presenteeism and explained that this right would promote a healthier workplace.

However, when the Labour government unveiled the Employment Rights Bill, the right to switch off was omitted. Instead, we were told that the right would be part of the government’s “Next Steps,” which were laid out in a document containing potential future reforms.

The Government’s Shift: What Has Changed?

Unfortunately, while the government initially claimed to be planning for a future right to disconnect, this no longer seems to be true. Reports suggest that ministers are no longer pursuing this promise, and the government is expected to scrap the proposed policy. Their reasoning? The economic pressure on businesses, as rising operational costs—including increases in National Insurance (NI) contributions—make such a policy unfeasible at this time.

According to The Sunday Times, a government source claimed that the right to switch off is effectively “dead.” They stated that the government’s priority is “growth that puts money in people’s pockets” and that reducing economic pressure on businesses will help achieve this. By removing “unnecessary barriers”—such as restrictions on when businesses can contact their staff—the government believes compliance costs will decrease, ultimately making “Britain the best country in the world in which to do business.”

The Right to Disconnect: International Context

The decision to scrap the Labour government’s right to switch off has been hit with some criticism, though. Opponents to the shift believe the move unnecessary for economic growth, while unions, employees, and business leaders alike fear increased worker burnout.

Interestingly, the UK wouldn’t have been alone had it introduced a right concerning work-related correspondence outside working hours. Several European countries have already adopted such policies. For instance, in France, the right to disconnect was introduced back in 2017, while Ireland established something similar in 2021.

These countries cite issues like work-life balance and mental health as key factors in their decisions. Therefore, while the government’s move may reflect an attitude to remain globally competitive, it risks falling behind its European counterparts with regard to worker well-being.

Legal Implications of Scrapping the Right to Switch Off

The government’s decision could have significant consequences for employees in the UK, particularly those who work remotely. Without formal legislation, grey areas may emerge regarding what constitutes a reasonable level of out-of-hours communication, potentially leading to disputes between employers and staff.

Employers may argue that flexible communication is essential for business operations, while employees may seek clear boundaries to prevent burnout. However, in the absence of legal protections, the responsibility may fall on employees to safeguard their well-being.

The Impact on Employee Well-Being and Burnout

As mentioned, another major concern stemming from the decision to scrap the right to switch off is employee burnout. Although many workers appreciate the increased flexibility that emerged after the pandemic, it has also blurred the boundaries between work and personal life. Employees often feel pressured to be constantly available, leading to heightened stress.

Answering emails after hours shouldn’t become the norm, and the right to disconnect was intended to address this issue. Nevertheless, with the policy now scrapped, more workers may experience burnout as they feel obligated to communicate with their employer outside of working hours.

What Does This Mean for Employers?

For employers, the government’s decision offers greater flexibility in contacting staff. This will be particularly welcomed in industries with unconventional operating hours.

However, while businesses may appreciate this freedom, they must proceed with caution. Overreliance on out-of-hours communication could lower morale and increase staff turnover. Employers who prioritise work-life balance will likely have an advantage in attracting and retaining top talent.

Furthermore, even if employees remain, a lack of downtime could lead to burnout, ultimately reducing productivity. As such, employers must balance the convenience of flexibility with the well-being of their workforce.

Final Thoughts

While staff welcomed post-pandemic flexibility, many have struggled to separate their professional and personal lives. The Labour government’s proposed right to switch off seemed like a breakthrough, particularly for remote workers. Yet, with plans to scrap this policy, the solution now appears to have vanished.

The government argues that this shift will drive economic growth and put more “money in people’s pockets,” but whether this will materialise remains to be seen. For now, unions, workers, and businesses must be proactive to ensure a healthy work-life balance and prioritise employee well-being.

If you have any employment law concerns or believe your rights have been breached, contact us immediately. Redmans Solicitors are sector specialists, and following a quick chat, we can provide answers and discuss your possible next steps.

To learn more about the help we provide, simply: