Sky Sports Commentator to Pay £700,000 to HMRC For Being a “Disguised Employee”

A Sky Sports commentator has been ordered to pay £700,000 in unpaid tax after a successful HMRC appeal ruled his employment had been incorrectly classified. Read on as we delve into what initially happened, the subsequent appeal, and how IR35 legislation ties into it all.

If you have any employment law queries, please get in touch with Redmans Solicitors now. We are experts in the sector and can provide specialist advice once we get to understand your circumstances.

To find out more about how we can help you:

Initial IR35 Tax Case Win for Sky Sports Commentator 

Former professional rugby union player and commentator Stuart Barnes was originally caught up in a dispute with HMRC concerning his employment status with Sky Sports. At the centre of the case, questions were raised about whether the Sky Sports pundit was genuinely self-employed through his company, S&L Barnes Ltd. HMRC contended that he was actually a “disguised employee” under the IR35 legislation.

However, in the first hearing, the Sky Sports commentator successfully argued he was, in fact, self-employed, meaning IR35 didn’t apply. Consequently, he managed to dodge a £695,000 tax liability, comprising income tax and NI contributions, HMRC claimed he owed.

Sky Sports Commentator Ordered to Pay Tax Liability Following HMRC Appeal

After Stuart Barnes’ success in the original hearing, HMRC decided to appeal the decision. They argued that the first-tier tribunal had failed to consider relevant factors in the working arrangement between the Sky Sports commentator and the broadcaster.

For starters, HMRC revealed that Stuart Barnes was unable to provide a substitute for his work. Moreover, they explained how Sky Sports held exclusive priority to its services for a substantial part of the year.

Taking these elements and the rugby commentator’s service length with the sports broadcaster into account, the original ruling was overturned. The tribunal concluded that the Sky Sports pundit should’ve been classified as an employee and fell within the IR35 legislation. As a result, they ordered him to pay the outstanding £700,000 tax bill for the period of 2013 to 2019.

Understanding IR35: Why Accurate Employment Classification Is Crucial to Avoiding Severe Tax Liabilities

Readers unfamiliar with the IR35 legislation may be unsure why this was pivotal to the case. Essentially, IR35 prevents tax avoidance by individuals providing a service through “intermediaries” who would otherwise be considered employees, if said intermediaries didn’t exist. 

The legislation was established to ensure “disguised employees” pay tax just as a regular employee would. In the case of the Sky Sports commentator, his company, S&L Barnes Ltd, served as such an intermediary, and as we now know, he was an employee.

Unfortunately, companies and workers may sometimes be tempted to try and avoid the IR35 scope. This is because, should the legislation apply, workers would be required to pay higher taxes, similar to regular employees. If this occurs, said workers may experience a net income reduction of up to 25%, and company contractors could face thousands in additional tax liabilities.

However, those tempted must be warned. If, like with the Sky Sports commentator, a tribunal finds that an individual’s employment was incorrectly classified, it could order the individual to pay the significant tax liability. This could put substantial strain on an individual’s finances, so getting the classification correct is essential.

Key Takeaways: The Importance of Reviewing Employment Contracts

The case involving the rugby commentator is a crucial reminder of the importance of thoroughly reviewing one’s employment contract. While Stuart Barnes’ dispute revolved around IR35 and correct employment classification, it underscores the broader issue that individuals must be fully aware of their contractual obligations and rights.

Contracts aren’t just formalities; they’re critical legal documents that detail essential employment rights and responsibilities. Misclassifications or misunderstandings could significantly impact an individual’s finances, career prospects or personal well-being, like with the Sky Sports commentator who has been handed a significant tax bill.

What’s more, should an employer breach an individual’s employment contract, they may be liable to pay compensation. This could be the case if, for example, the employer fails to pay the individual’s wages or incorrectly follows a disciplinary procedure. Consequently, it’s essential all parties to an employment contract are aware of and fully understand the terms of the agreement. 

If you’re unsure about your contract or want guidance on any employment law matters, please don’t hesitate to contact us. Redmans Solicitors specialises in providing tailored advice to ensure your employment rights are protected.

To begin, simply: